🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest is no longer a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that authorities allow or withhold at their discretion. This represents the implication of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location demonstrations can take place, with potential prison sentences for those who defy these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Previous administrations had already weakened this essential right: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "serious and unjustified limitations" on civil liberties. Collectively, these incremental attacks on liberty have practically eliminated the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Tragedy to Justify Crackdown

The most recent restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a British Islamic center. We can all agree on universal agreement that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, employing this atrocity as a justification to stifle opposition is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"If you can't set boundaries at genocide, you likely cannot draw the line at democracy," observed a well-known American author, whose words that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Context of Protest

Reflect on Britain's rich history of public demonstration and direct action against racism and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their era, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Present Situation

In today's complex situation, here's what's truly occurring: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have described as genocide. Its military actions have led the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

Western public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a complete ban on weapons exports to the nation, and back the detention of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially lost the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to try to suppress a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this effort. Government officials have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these demonstrators until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish identity with the policies of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly challenged for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a situation where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or deliberately" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have stated that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "complicit" in supposed mistreatment faced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the horrific toll from two years of ongoing violence that have claimed many thousands of human lives. British political leaders and media outlets have barely concealed the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a dangerous boundary by proscribing Palestine Action, a peaceful, human rights-focused direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, mostly for holding signs opposing mass killing and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; including a former clergyman and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "linked with" other nations, while the current president described such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to control opposition. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors fought, suffered and sacrificed their lives to secure our liberties. We may eventually rue how easily we permitted them to be eroded.