🔗 Share this article

For a brief period, the former US president gave the impression to adopt a strong stance regarding Ukraine. After delivering statements of "serious repercussions" in August should Vladimir Putin persisted obstructing ceasefire negotiations, he ultimately imposed substantial restrictions on Russia's primary energy firms, Rosneft and Lukoil. This action significantly impacted Putin's ability to support his war effort in the region.

But, through his newly presented comprehensive peace proposal for Ukraine, that was drafted by US and Russian representatives lacking Ukrainian or EU input, he has seemingly gone back to his Russia-friendly position.

Rewarding Aggression

This proposal would essentially benefit Putin for occupying Ukraine while leaving the country's political freedom in danger. Despite ringing proclamations that "Ukraine's independence will be upheld", large portions of the initiative in reality undermine that essential sovereignty. Seen as a Russian ideal would probably be a catastrophe for the nation.

Demonstrating his corporate experience, the former president persists to view the situation in Ukraine as a mere territorial dispute, implying giving Russia a section of Ukraine's territory will satisfy the leader. Yet, Russia's military campaign is not merely about occupying a destroyed region of industrial-devastated land in Ukraine's east. Rather, it is about the nation's democracy – and Putin's apparent goal to eliminate it so it ceases to serves as an appealing example for the Russian citizens of the democratic government that Putin's growing authoritarian rule withholds them.

Land Concessions

While freezing in position the currently divided Ukrainian provinces of these areas, Trump's proposal would require the nation to surrender the whole this eastern territory. Aside from rewarding Russia with territory that its troops have been failed to capture in more than a ten years of warfare, this giveaway would make Ukraine's military defenses critically compromised.

This region is the place of the nation's well-known "defensive line", the fortified military defenses that represent a key impediment to Russian advances. The proposal would have Ukraine leave these positions, providing Russian forces a clear route to the capital in case he subsequently opt to renew the conflict.

Military Restrictions

Furthermore, in a step that would make additional hostilities more feasible for Russia, Trump would mandate Ukraine to diminish the numbers of its military from their current 800,000 to 850,000 soldiers to a cap of this lower number. Importantly, Trump's proposal imposes no equivalent constraints on Russian forces.

Seemingly as a accommodation to Putin's campaign to depict Ukraine's legitimate leadership as Nazis, the plan declares: "All Nazi belief system and activities must be condemned and prohibited." As if to underscore this point, it requires that "The nation will hold elections in three months" of a peace deal. However, Trump imposes no requirement that the Russian leader endanger his regime by allowing votes in Russia.

Security Commitments

Certainly, the proposal includes Russia promise not to "invade bordering nations" and to "establish in regulation its stance of non-aggression towards Europe and the Ukrainian people". However given that the Russian leadership has breached equivalent agreements in the previous instances – for example the Budapest accord, in which the Russian government promised to recognize Ukraine's sovereignty in exchange for relinquishing its historical nuclear weapons, and the Minsk accords, in which Moscow committed to a truce and a return of captured territory in the Donbas to Kyiv – how should anyone trust this commitment now?

That is why Ukraine has been so insistent on external defense commitments. Although the proposal warns of a "immediate joint defense action" in case the Russian Federation renew its aggression, and provides that "The nation will receive strong defense commitments", the details vary from vague to troubling. The plan would not only prevent the nation accession to NATO but also preclude member states from deploying military personnel on the nation's land, thus precluding the peacekeeping contingent, presumptively headed by Britain and France, on which Ukraine had been relying to deter Putin from restoring his reduced military, rearming, and reinvading.

Global Concern

Another side agreement according to sources would grant the nation with a similar to NATO defense commitment, in which any subsequent "significant, intentional, and sustained military assault" by Russia on Ukraine "would be considered as an assault endangering the peace and security of the allied countries." This indicates a defense action. But in contrast to a powerful Ukrainian military – the nation's primary defense against additional invasion – the effectiveness of the side agreement would depend on the commitment of Western powers, such as the US administration, to react with force to Russia's attacks, something they have {not