🔗 Share this article

Following a significant regulatory appeal, a national review panel has overturned a earlier ruling that blocked viewers in Australia from accessing recorded content of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was lodged by Elon Musk's company X, arguing against an directive issued at the request of the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Case and Classification Ruling

Following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the eSafety commissioner applied to the review board to officially classify the circulating video. It initially ruled the content was "refused classification", a designation that allowed the regulator to instruct social media companies to geo-block the posts for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for two separate videos related to the Kirk incident. It also appealed a comparable ban on a separate video—showing the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Final Ruling

Arguing its case, X contended that the footage in question contained only brief violence with the weapon not shown. The company noted the recording was low-quality and the focus shifted rapidly from the victim to the bystanders.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or offensive, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a notorious public event of historical and political significance that prompted widespread discussion". The platform even compared the video and the historic film of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the review board ultimately agreed that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with different editing could have met that threshold. Consequently, the board revised the rating of the content to R18+.

A Dissenting Viewpoint

Some on the panel held a contrary view, arguing the post was "a shareable video for the probable aim of amusement and/or benefit (such as engagement metrics)". This view stated the comparison to the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as that footage was released long after the event, "once emotions around the matter had subsided".

Response Following the Outcome

Posting on its global government affairs account, X expressed approval of the decision.

"We challenged this case to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of access to information about issues of public interest. Our commitment remains committed to protecting these principles."

Representatives for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the board's decision, but pointed out that the revised classification now means platforms "must take steps to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to users under 18".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

In related news, the regulator has not issued formal notices to social media companies this week regarding graphic footage from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were upsetting, they did not reach the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

As an alternative, platforms have been advised to use warning labels and interstitials, such as blurring, on such content in line with their existing community guidelines.